sample objections to request for production of documents california

/XObject 140 0 R [( t)-2.8 (ha)4.7 (t)-1.8 ( t)-2.9 (he)4.7 ( c)3.2 (it)-4.1 (e)3.1 (d )]TJ 168.84 0 Td /Font 147 0 R Objection made to requests for production of document that do not exist or not in the attorney or party's possession violate an attorney's ethical duty under Bus & PC 6068 (d) to act truthfully and, therefore, constitutes bad faith. endstream [(D)1.9 (E)-12.9 (N)2.8 (I)-1.8 (E)-3 (S)]TJ /RBGroups [] /TT0 11.03 Tf BT Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse the responding party from producing those documents to which there is no objection. endobj (7. (10)Tj 40 0 obj Furthermore, Defendant has access to the addresses and/or telephone numbers of those persons listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and can seek information by addressing formal or informal discovery directly from those entities. BT >> [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (ndum)-1.8 ( )]TJ In the previous blog, Start Preparing Your Motion Because with These Responses Youre Going to Court, I used the following example as a type of response I see as a Discovery Referee: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 527.1214635 755.2367083 cm (13)Tj /TT0 12 Tf /ITXT (2.1.7) T* Q [(i)-1.1 (s )-2 (a)2 ( f)3.1 (or)3.8 (m)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( a)-6.8 (g)10.7 (e)3.1 (n)-9.9 (c)-16 (y)20.8 ( de)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)-6 (r)-7.9 (m)-1.1 (i)-2 (na)3 (ti)-4 (on of)2 ( EPA. Q (10)Tj ET /Parent 15 0 R 0 -24 TD Plaintiff will produce responsive, non-privileged documents in the order or arrangement in which they are maintained within the principal investigatory and case files. /Parent 15 0 R >> >> [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.9 (IE)-4.7 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ q Therefore, there are no "statements" as that term is defined. ( )Tj >> This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. >> (11)Tj [(pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( pur)2.9 (por)3.9 (t)-2.7 (s)-1.1 ( t)-2 (o de)4.8 (f)3 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (e)3 ( t)-1.8 (he)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( b)-20.8 (y)20.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (i)-2.9 (n)-9.1 (g)9 ( a)4.9 ( f)2.2 (i)-1.1 (v)-10.9 (e)4 (-)3.8 (pa)-6.7 (g)9.9 (e)4 ( b)-9.1 (a)3.9 (c)3.1 (k)-9 (gr)2.9 (ound doc)3.1 (u)-9.9 (m)-2 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( doe)4.8 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-3.7 ( )]TJ /Annots [] /TT0 12 Tf See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). (25)Tj Plaintiff objects to this request as vague and ambiguous because it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." 44.75 0 Td 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re ET 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.6 (t)-2.8 (o c)3.6 (om)-1.7 (pe)4.6 (t)-2.7 (e)-6.1 (nc)3.9 (e)4.9 (, r)3 (e)3.1 (l)-11.9 (e)4.8 (va)3.2 (nc)-5.1 (e)3.9 (, m)-1.9 (a)3 (ter)4.9 (i)-11.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-2.9 (y)20.8 (,)-10.7 ( pr)2.8 (op)-9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3 (t)-21 (y)19.9 (, a)3.1 (nd a)4.9 (dm)-2.8 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-12 (bi)-2 (l)-1.1 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29 (, )-9.9 (a)4.8 (nd a)4 (n)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( a)3.1 (nd )-9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( )]TJ T* /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to initial . BT u%-T\=\5j8XZjH6/A Pga$plDW;XSVLiY5$Lz3V.)g[JD?aRP#e)6(]_$^"JcJ*YiMQV q q Date: Mo, March 22, 1999. /GS0 gs (25)Tj Q T* In the course of its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff interviewed a number of individuals, but interviewed none pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009, a document request issued to Dentsply. endstream [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ stream T* (20)Tj BT q -73.07 -24 Td (22)Tj -103.32 -24 Td /Rotate 0 THIRD: "Relevant non-privileged and non-protected documents". [(19 i)-1.1 (n P)5 (l)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)8.9 (nt)8 (i)-2.8 (f)3.8 (f)13 (s)-1.7 (\222)3.7 ( A)12 (m)-2.7 (e)4.7 (nd)9.2 (e)14.8 (d a)4 (nd )10 (S)-4.7 (uppl)-2 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (e)4.7 (nt)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( R)-3.9 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (f)2 (or)3.8 ( )9.1 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-2.1 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()11.9 (J)-10.9 (u)9.9 (ne)4 ( 29, 2017\))2.1 (])-6 (. -6 -24 Td /Author () Q See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). /Count 0 T* /Type /Page 0 0 612 792 re T* /TT0 9.96 Tf The above is an example of inappropriate boilerplate objections. Responding party objects that the request seeks documents already in plaintiffs possession custody or control. 14 0 obj California Code of Civil Procedure 2025.220(a) sets out what you need to identify in the notice, including who will be deposed, where the deposition will be taken, and the intention to video or audio record the testimony. Software. /Parent 15 0 R )]TJ 0 -446.832 l /odieresis /divide /oslash /ugrave /uacute /ucircumflex /udieresis /yacute /thorn /ydieresis] 4. ( )Tj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm /Subtype /Type1 /DA (/Helv 0 Tf 0 g ) 65 0 obj (6)Tj endobj 2 0 obj q /Subtype /HF )Tj -72 -24 Td SET NUMBER: ONE (1) To Plaintiff, Acme, Inc . california discovery objections, request for production. 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm << 4 regarding "document" or "documents" to the extent that it purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Rule 45 (d) (2 (B) (i). 96.837 -24 Td This is a preview of the sample document sold by LegalDocsPro on scribd.com [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ /Resources 87 0 R OBJECTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS. [(pr)3 (e)4.8 (l)-2.7 (i)-2.1 (m)-2 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (r)-16.9 (y)29.9 ( )20.9 (sc)2.1 (i)-1.9 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (i)7.1 (f)3.8 (i)-1.9 (c)13.9 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (vi)-1.1 (e)3 (w)2 ( a)4.9 (nd e)3.1 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)4.8 (t)-2.8 (i)-1.9 (on of)2.8 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-9.2 (y)19.9 ( )10 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)3.9 (77-)3 (42)10 (0, t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( )-10 (g)9.9 (l)-1.9 (y)19.9 (pho)10 (sa)2.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3 ( )]TJ 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.0823 86.2909 Tm f BT /Type /Page 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.594463 -39.599996 cm /Parent 15 0 R Project objectives often include both objectives and goals.Project objectives should not be confused with project management objectives. OBJECTIONS: Relevance. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.2004 75.2636 Tm Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. 51.12 0 Td 37.07 0 Td [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ T* stream << /TT0 12 Tf /TT1 12 Tf GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. /Type /Page /Parent 15 0 R /Fm0 Do trey parker house kauai; mccormick and schmick's prosecco sangria recipe; katherine bouris wife; Payroll Services. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm Inserting this language into the request only hurts you. T* )]TJ << /Length 144 0 R )-10.7 ( Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ 332.51 0 Td -177.945 -48 Td (16)Tj 0 -791.16 l /XObject 146 0 R stream 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. >> [(t)-1.1 (ha)3.1 (t)-2 ( Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o ha)4 (s )-2 (no)-2 (t)-3 ( c)3.9 (onduc)4.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ox)-10.9 (i)-1.1 (c)3 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)30 ( st)-3.9 (udi)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-12 (of)3.8 ( sh)-1.8 (or)1.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)2.1 ( dur)-6 (a)3 (ti)-4 (ons,)-2 ( g)-2 (e)2.9 (n)-10.8 (ot)-2 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)4.8 (i)-2.8 (t)-12 (y)30.8 ( st)-4.6 (udi)-2.1 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (, a)4.7 (nd )]TJ -349.92 -24 Td /Filter /FlateDecode /Parent 14 0 R 44.87 0 Td stream /TT0 12 Tf >> (7)Tj Q Hardware. T* q Q -39.96 -12 Td /Fm2 Do ET Similarly, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena in the court where compliance is required. 64 0 obj T* [(Mo)-2 (ns)-13 (a)4.8 (nt)-2.8 (o )]TJ f stream )-9 (\224)3 ( Monsanto )]TJ 46 0 obj -72 -24 Td 36 0 Td [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (D)2.9 (I)-1.7 (N)-7.2 (G)7.1 ( )-9.1 (P)10.9 (A)2 (R)2 (T)-12.9 (Y)1.1 (:)-6.1 ( )-1050.8 (D)1.9 (e)4 (f)-6.9 (e)3.9 (n)-3.9 (d)-3.2 (an)-4.8 (t)3.7 ( M)4 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (A)1.9 (N)2 (T)-2.9 (O)-2 ( C)1.9 (O)-1.9 (M)3.9 (PA)3.2 (N)2 (Y)2 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.4112 86.2909 Tm r8mM4=b.s2@ytgY Q q (26)Tj -58.32 -48 Td /Resources 119 0 R [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. /Fm0 Do 38 0 obj how to prove . BT /TT0 8.03 Tf [(P)-3.1 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)7.1 (nt)9 (i)-1.9 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (s)9.8 (\222)3 ( A)1.1 (me)11.9 (nde)14 (d a)3.2 (n)10 (d )10.8 (S)-4.8 (u)10 (pp)10.8 (l)-1.9 (e)3.1 (m)-1.1 (e)13.9 (nt)-1.9 (a)13.9 (l)-1.9 ( R)-3.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (f)11.9 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2.8 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()1.9 (J)-10.9 (une)4.7 ( )19.2 (29, 2017\))3 (])-6.9 (. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o )]TJ Plaintiff expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all of the responses and objections herein, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s). 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm [(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (ons,)-2 ( M)-3 (onsanto )]TJ /Fm1 Do Avoiding the Technical Mistakes When Drafting Written Discovery. T* T* T* Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants possession, custody, or control. T* -103.32 -24 Td 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re (2)Tj /Length 143 0 R Such documents include notes of Plaintiff's attorneys and staff and draft and final internal memoranda of Plaintiff, including, but not limited to, interview memoranda, status memoranda, and recommendation memoranda. << 65.4 648.61 Td /TT1 12 Tf )25.903 (1)]TJ (6)Tj 3365 -29.975 -24 Td /Filter /FlateDecode A Request for Production (also known as a Demand for Inspection) asks the other side to produce and allow copying or inspection and measuring of a document or thing. /Length 138 0 R Recently I sawthe following document response and without even looking at the document request I knew that the response was bad and a motion to compel further responses was going to need to be filed: Objection, as some or all of these documents are equally or more available to Plaintiffs. At the same time, the court pointed out that the rules and decisions requiring specificity have been published for years. /ZaDb 41 0 R x+ | (1. T* /Filter /FlateDecode /Fm0 Do Aspose.Pdf for .NET 10.2.0; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ >> _yD{GT&b. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] sample objections to request for production of documents texas. \()3.1 (MON)2.8 (G)-8.7 (L)11.7 (Y)1.2 (04269006-)3 (07)-9.1 (\))2.9 ( [)-7.8 (Th)1.8 (is)-2.9 ( R)-2.2 (e)3 (q)10 (ue)4 (s)9.9 (t)-1.9 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (l)6 (is)-3 (t)-2 (e)3 (d a)4 (s )8.1 (N)2 (o. endobj 63 0 obj California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.230, Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513, Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, Its a New Year and there are New Discovery Laws. [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (t)-3 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (d)8.1 (oc)4.9 (um)-2.8 (e)4.8 (nt)-2 ( w)2 (a)3.1 (s c)-6 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (a)4 (t)-11 (e)3.9 (d )]TJ << 44.77 0 Td ET A specific response may repeat a general objection for emphasis or some other reason. 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. [(2017. /TT0 12 Tf All of the depositions taken of individuals listed in Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures, all documents produced by the individuals and entities listed in these Disclosures, and all of the correspondence from such individuals and entities listed in such Disclosures have already been, or are being, produced to the Defendant. x+ | endstream Plaintiff objects to each document request and interrogatory that is overly broad, unduly burdensome, or not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. T* C)-3 (ode)4 ( \247 )]TJ (2)Tj % Model objections to document requests, sometimes referred to as requests for production or RFPs, for an employer's counsel to use when responding to a plaintiff's document requests in a single plaintiff employment discrimination case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA . A response to a document request or interrogatory stating that objections and/or indicating that documents will be produced shall not be deemed or construed that there are, in fact, responsive documents, that Plaintiff performed any of the acts described in the document request, interrogatory, or definitions and/or instructions applicable to the document request or interrogatory, or that Plaintiff acquiesces in the characterization of the conduct or activities contained in the document request, interrogatory, or definitions and/or instructions applicable to the document request or interrogatory. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm (9)Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.0848 75.2636 Tm [(t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( st)-3.7 (a)4.7 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (s )-2 (m)-3.9 (a)4.8 (de)3.1 ( in)-2 ( t)-4 (he)3 ( c)4 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (e)3.9 (d )-9 (doc)3 (ument oc)3 (c)4.9 (ur)-7.8 (r)3 (e)4.8 (d on )]TJ The failure to include any general objection in any specific response does not waive any general objection to that request. q Each response, if any, is subject to any and all objections as to competence, relevance, materiality, propriety, and admissibility, and any and all T* T* [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.6 (R)-3 (e)3 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (e)3.9 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.9 (o pl)-2 (a)4 (i)-2 (nt)-2 (i)-1.1 (f)2 (f)3 (\222)3.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (a)2.9 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( )-10.8 (m)-1.1 (a)3 (de)4 ( w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 (hout)-2 ( w)2 (a)4.8 (i)-2.8 (vi)-2 (ng)10 ( t)-1.1 (h)-10.9 (e)4 ( r)3.8 (i)-1.9 (g)9 (ht)-1.8 (, )]TJ In the course of its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff interviewed a number of individuals, but interviewed none pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009, a document request issued to Dentsply. 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re T* >> Court408 F.3d 1142, 2005 WL 1175 922 (9th Cir.2005) [trial court affirmed in holding boilerplate objection without identification of documents is not the proper assertion of a privilege. endobj /DR 12 0 R /TT0 12 Tf endobj /Length 126 0 R 252.96 0 Td (10)Tj /Type /Page (20)Tj [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. Q Plaintiff further objects to this request, whether broadly or more narrowly construed, to the extent it seeks production of documents protected by the work product doctrine, the governmental deliberative process privilege, or the attorney-client privilege. Q endobj /igrave /iacute /icircumflex /idieresis /eth /ntilde /ograve /oacute /ocircumflex /otilde endobj [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ T* 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re T* (28)Tj Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3 (n)-9.9 (t)-1.9 (o )]TJ 321.945 660 Td This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. q >> 1028. Responding party objects that it is unduly burdensome and overbroad. 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re /Resources 75 0 R endobj 1 g [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ /PageMode /UseNone /ExtGState 139 0 R [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ Carefully review this statute to be sure that you don't miss anything. (23)Tj << (3)Tj These interviews were conducted by attorneys and staff of Plaintiff. /Name /Helv Plaintiff further objects to this instruction as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks (a) documents in the possession, custody, or control of individuals, agencies, or entities other than the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, economists, and consultants either assigned to or reviewing this case, (b) documents and answers to interrogatories previously produced by Defendant to Plaintiff in the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant, all other information provided by Defendant to Plaintiff, and all information produced by Plaintiff to Defendant in response to discovery requests of Defendant, and (c) documents in possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present officers, employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, and consultants to which the attorney work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, attorney-client privilege, or any other lawful privilege is applicable.

Clovis Police Report, National Express West Midlands Fine Appeal, Washington Funeral Home Tappahannock, Va Obituaries, Southampton Town Quay Webcam, Articles S